Panel

Day One
Sunday, January 6
12:00pm ~ 4:00pm

Agenda: Our meeting on Day One will give us an opportunity to get to know one another, to share our views on "globalization, fairness, and public institutions" in the light of September 11, and to share some our personal experiences with globalization.

6:00 - 9:00pm

Reception in the Lobby of the Korean Center

Day Two
Monday, January 7

Agenda: Day One focuses on what is happening now with globalization, public institutions, and fairness, and the consequences of this.

8:00 - 8:45AM	Breakfast in the Center for Korean Studies
8:45 - 9:00AM	Openning Remarks: Jim Dator and Dick Pratt

9:00 - 10:30AM

Session 1

Discussion Question: What kinds of societal, environmental, and intergenerational challenges to public institutions do you believe can be attributed to globalization?

Discussion Initiator: Yong-duck Jung
Comment: Daniel Kwok

10:30 - 10:40AM

Refreshment Break

10:40 - 12:10PM

Session 2

Discussion Question: How do you see public institutions presently responding to these challenges? That is, what are the specific practices that are wholly or in part responses to challenges presented by globalization?

Discussion Initiator: Yoshiko Kojo
Comment: Ronald Brown

12:10 - 1:30PM

Lunch in the Center for Korean Studies

1:30 - 3:00PM

Session 3

Discussion Question: How do you think globalization may be changing our ideas of what
public institutions are?

Discussion Initiator: James N. Rosenau
Comment: Carolyn Stephenson

3:00 - 3:10PM

Refreshment Break

3:10 - 4:40PM

Session 4

Discussion Question: How is globalization changing what is meant by fairness in society,
or for future generations, or in relation to the environment?

Discussion Initiator: Qing Wu
Comment: Edgar Porter

Day Three
Tuesday, January 8

Agenda: Day Two focuses on what public institutions should be doing in response to
globalization, in contrast with what they are doing now.

8:00 - 9:00AM

Breakfast in the Center for Korean Studies

9:00 - 10:30AM

Session 5

Discussion Question: What goals and specific practices should public institutions,
as we understand them, adopt in your society in the immediate future to respond to
globalization fairly, in relation to society, future generations, or the environment?

Discussion Initiator: Jiafu Yu
Comment: Tony Marsella

10:30 - 10:40AM

Refreshment Break

10:40 - 12:10PM

Session 6

Discussion Question: What obstacles do public institutions currently encounter which
prevent them from doing what you believe is desirable?

Discussion Initiator: Chanto D. Sisowath
Comment: James White

12:10 - 1:30PM

Lunch in the Center for Korean Studies

1:30 - 3:00PM

Session 7

Discussion Question: What obstacles are pubic institutions likely to encounter in the
future (more than five years) that may prevent them from doing what is desirable?

Discussion Initiator: Ryo Oshiba
Comment: Kate Zhou

3:00 - 3:10PM

Refreshment Break

3:10 - 4:40PM

Session 8

Discussion Question: What are the existing developments and forces which, if encouraged
or supported, can help to facilitate the desired responses of public institutions? Similarly,
what new forces or factors need to be encouraged or supported in order to facilitate the
desired responses of public institutions?

Discussion Initiator: Van Anh Le
Comment: Fred Riggs

Day Four
Wednessday, January 9

Agenda: Day Three focuses on identifying what needs to be done in order for public institutions
to do what they should to address fairness in the context of globalization.

8:00 - 9:00AM

Breakfast in the Center for Korean Studies

9:00 - 10:30AM

Session 9

Discussion Question: What educational, training, and research activities should be
undertaken in order to overcome the obstacles, nourish the opportunities, and invent new processes that address fairness in relation to the societal, environmental, and intergenerational issues raised by globalization?

Discussion Initiator: Doug Allen
Comment: Peter Adler

10:30 - 10:40AM

Refreshment Break

10:40 - 12:10PM

Session 10

Discussion Question: To what extent is this range of education, training, and research
activities being done, or not done in, or for, your society?

Discussion Initiator: Jingping Ding
Comment: Chris Grandy

12:10 - 1:30PM

Lunch in the Center for Korean Studies

1:30 - 3:00PM

Session 11

Discussion Question: What are the educational, training, and research needs likely to be
in the future (more than five years) that are different than today?

Discussion Initiator: Shoji Nishimoto
Comment: Sohail Inayatullah

3:00 - 3:10PM

Refreshment Break

3:10 - 4:40PM

Session 12

Discussion Question: When the current or anticipated educational, training, and research
activities are not being addressed, who should undertake these activities? Are those who
should undertake this likely to be different in the future?

Discussion Initiator: Seanglim Bit
Comment: Lee Cataluna and Walt Anderson

4:40 - 5:30PM

Summing Session:

Concluding Remarks by Jim Dator and Dick Pratt

The Role of Discussion Initiator
In order to get us started each session, we have asked one of you to begin the discussion. Each of you will find your name listed as a "Discussion Initiator" for one session. We would appreciate your spending about five minutes at the beginning of the session giving us your response to the questions assigned to this particular session, and then serving as the co-moderator (with either Dick Pratt or Jim Dator) of the ensuing discussion during the session.
We of course expect each participant to contribute to the discussion of all of the questions posed for each session of our conference. We just thought it would help to designate one of you to initiate the discussion each session.